Criterica Intelligence — production models trained on real court records, not synthetic data
EBSA · Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program · FY2022

EBSA Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program, Fiscal Year 2022

Applications processed and correction amounts reported under the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program and the Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program.

Sourced Figures

Year-Over-Year

VFCP applications rebounded to 1,374, while DFVCP filings held roughly steady at 22,444.

What Changed in FY2022

EBSA leadership flagged SECURE 2.0 implementation and the ESG-investing-factors rule as active priorities; recoveries fell sharply from FY2021’s terminated-vested-participant-driven peak as that surge normalized.

Criterica Intelligence Read

The Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program and its companion Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program are EBSA's self-correction channels, and participation in them is itself a meaningful signal: a plan sponsor or fiduciary that voluntarily corrects a breach or late filing before EBSA identifies it independently receives materially more favorable treatment than one caught through an investigation, which makes program volume a proxy for how actively the regulated community is self-policing in a given year rather than a measure of enforcement activity directed at anyone.

Duration for voluntary correction is the shortest and most predictable in EBSA's entire enforcement ecosystem, because the process is structured, self-initiated, and does not involve the adversarial dynamics of an investigation — a sponsor identifies the issue, applies the prescribed correction methodology, and receives a no-action letter once the correction is verified. That predictability is exactly why the programs exist: they give fiduciaries and plan administrators a defined, bounded-cost path to resolve common errors — late participant contributions, prohibited transactions, delinquent Form 5500 filings — without the multi-year overhang of a formal civil investigation.

For insurers and plan sponsors, VFCP and DFVCP participation volume is best read as a compliance-culture indicator rather than a risk indicator: rising participation reflects growing awareness of correctable fiduciary errors and a functioning internal compliance process, not rising misconduct, and a plan sponsor's own use of these programs is a mitigating factor — not an aggravating one — in how EBSA and, separately, a fiduciary liability insurer should weigh that sponsor's overall risk profile.

Resolution under both programs is entirely administrative: correction plus any required earnings restoration for VFCP, or a reduced late-filing penalty under DFVCP's fixed fee schedule, with no formal enforcement record attaching once the correction is accepted. Criterica Intelligence frames voluntary correction-program volume as a self-policing signal that should reduce, not increase, a sponsor's modeled exposure relative to comparable plans that have not used these channels, for the fiduciaries, insurers, and funders assessing plan-level compliance risk.

See How EBSA Patterns Inform Duration Intelligence
Frequently Asked Questions
How many voluntary fiduciary correction program did the EBSA report for FY2022?

VFCP applications received: 1,374, per DOL EBSA Fact Sheet: Fiscal Year 2022 EBSA Enforcement (as of 2022-11-01).

How does FY2022 compare with the prior fiscal year?

VFCP applications rebounded to 1,374, while DFVCP filings held roughly steady at 22,444.

What is a notable EBSA action from FY2022?

No individually named, sourced action for FY2022 has been confirmed for this category yet.

What changed in EBSA enforcement priorities in FY2022?

EBSA leadership flagged SECURE 2.0 implementation and the ESG-investing-factors rule as active priorities; recoveries fell sharply from FY2021’s terminated-vested-participant-driven peak as that surge normalized.

Figures on this page are drawn from official agency publications, cited individually below, and reflect the agency’s own reporting as of the date shown for each figure. They are not Criterica Intelligence model outputs, are not predictions, and are not a measure of any party’s legal exposure or liability. Agencies periodically revise prior-year figures; where a revision is known, both figures are shown with their sources. This page does not constitute legal, investment, or compliance advice.

Talk to Us