Criterica Intelligence — 26,563 production models trained on 3.52B+ real court records
Company
█

Structuredpredictionasinfrastructure.

Criterica Intelligence is the data science and model infrastructure division of Criterica Group. We build the prediction and decision systems that underwrite complex litigation, price legal risk, and power capital deployment at institutional scale. 26,563 production models. 3.52B+ real court records. Outcome certainty is the product.

Criterica Intelligence was established to solve a structural gap in legal risk markets: outcome data existed across millions of court records, but no infrastructure existed to translate it into reliable, decision-ready intelligence. Founded on the thesis that legal outcomes follow predictable patterns when analyzed at institutional scale, the platform was built to serve every participant in the legal risk ecosystem — capital allocators, law firms, and insurance carriers — with the same underlying intelligence, structured for each decision context. Today, 26,563 production models trained on 3.52B+ real court records power underwriting decisions across litigation finance, legal intake, and insurance exposure management.

Mission

Precision is not a feature. It is the foundation. Every model we build, every dataset we ingest, every prediction we deliver is held to the standard of institutional-grade certainty. We do not approximate. We tune until a 70 percent prediction is right about 70 percent of the time.

Approach

We acquire, structure, and model outcomes data from regulated industries. Our infrastructure is built on real judicial records, financial filings, and regulatory enforcement data. Not synthetic. Not approximated. The moat is the data. The edge is how reliably it predicts.

The Tangent Point
The Mark

The point where the rate of change is steepest.

CURVE

A sigmoid — the natural shape of outcome probability as evidence accumulates. It starts uncertain, accelerates through a critical zone, then resolves.

LINE

A tangent at the inflection. It represents the derivative: not the probability itself, but the rate at which certainty is emerging. That is the actionable signal.

RING

The exact point of contact between curve and tangent. Where rate of change is maximum. Where the system has found the answer. The ring says: we found the exact point.

Nothing else in this space locates that point. That is the product.

Global Presence
United States
Active
3.52B+ records · 50 states · 89 judicial districts
All federal circuits, 50 states. Licensed financial intelligence and regulatory enforcement datasets integrated.
United Kingdom
Active
England & Wales, Northern Ireland · 5 production models
England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland. ABS-eligible — non-lawyer ownership unlocks law firm equity structures.
Australia
Active
NSW, Federal Court · active models deployed
All states. ABS jurisdiction with mature non-lawyer ownership frameworks. PI and commercial litigation coverage.
Canada
Active
BC, AB, ON, QC · 14 roles in production
British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec. Common law provinces with predictive feature parity to US courts.
South America
Coverage Established
Data ingested — model training underway.
Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Argentina. Commercial litigation and international arbitration expansion.
Asia Pacific
Coverage Established
Data ingested — model training underway.
Singapore (SIAC), Hong Kong (HKIAC), Japan. Major arbitration seats and growing institutional litigation finance.
Middle East
Coverage Established
Data ingested — model training underway.
UAE (DIFC/ADGM), Saudi Arabia, Qatar. ICC seat expansion and sovereign capital moving into legal finance.
India
Coverage Established
Data ingested — model training underway.
Supreme Court 2018 third-party funding clearance. $1.3T+ legal market. Expansion in formation.
European Union
Coverage
CJEU and regulatory enforcement data integrated. ICC and ICSID international arbitration coverage.
26,563†
Production models
3.52B+†
Real court records
4 jurisdictions
Active coverage

Statistics shown reflect historical or illustrative model outputs derived from real case data. They are not predictions or guarantees of any individual outcome. Litigation results depend on facts, jurisdiction, judge, and counsel, and vary case by case. Model accuracy is subject to selection effects and changing legal dynamics.